<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Imhosted Reviews &#38; Imhosted Coupon - Imhosted Hosted &#187; Imhosted Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted/imhosted-problem/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imhostedreview.org</link>
	<description>imhosted reviews and imhosted user reviews that you must read before sign up imhosted.com hosting. imhosted reviews from forums, blogs, and user submitted. Learn the pros and cons discovered through this imhosted web hosting reviews. This imhosted blog is also about imhosted coupon, imhosted discount, imhosted rebate, and imhosted promotion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Imhosted uptime &amp; imhosted review for June 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-imhosted-review-for-june-2009</link>
		<comments>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-imhosted-review-for-june-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 04:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Imhosted Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imhosted Downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imhosted Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imhosted Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imhostedreview.org/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imhosted uptime by imhostedreview.org for June 2009: 99.68% over the internet A poor uptime for this month with imhosted hosting. The previs uptime we monitored was 99.6%, and this month uptime was 99.6% too, its quit alot of downtime and problem with imhosted hosting. With 20 downtime, and over 100 minutes of downtime. Server response [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Imhosted uptime by imhostedreview.org for June 2009:</strong> 99.68% over the internet</p>
<p>A poor uptime for this month with <a href="http://www.imhostedreview.org/" target="_self">imhosted</a> hosting. The previs uptime we monitored was 99.6%, and this month uptime was 99.6% too, its quit alot of downtime and problem with <a href="http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted/imhosted-hosting" target="_self">imhosted hosting</a>. With 20 downtime, and over 100 minutes of downtime. Server response is still OK, with no big concern. There was many minor downtime here and there, especially at the mid of the month. You should compare imhosted hosting with other <a href="http://www.topwebhostingreviews.org/" target="_self">top web hosting</a> found at <a href="http://www.topwebhostingreviews.org/" target="_self">Topwebhostingreviews.org</a>, namely <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a><a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostgator</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>bluehost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostmonster</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ixwebhosting</strong></a>,<a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a> <a href="http://www.midphasereview.org/"><strong>midphase</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ipower</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a><a href="http://www.anhostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>anhosting</strong></a><a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a>, <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2hosting</strong></a> etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Imhosted Uptime" src="../images/imhosted-uptime-june-2009.gif" alt="" width="586" height="847" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-imhosted-review-for-june-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imhosted uptime for september 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-for-september-2008</link>
		<comments>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-for-september-2008#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Imhosted Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imhosted Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imhosted Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imhostedreview.org/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imhosted uptime for september 2008: 96% over the Internet This month imhosted uptime suck again. If you refering back to previos months of imhosted server uptime, you will be supprise how bad is their hosting services, 77% uptime.. 94% service uptime, and now a 96% service uptime. That is alot of service downtime happening here&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Imhosted uptime for september 2008</strong>: 96% over the Internet</p>
<p>This month imhosted uptime suck again. If you refering back to previos months of imhosted server uptime, you will be supprise how bad is their hosting services, 77% uptime.. 94% service uptime, and now a 96% service uptime.</p>
<p>That is alot of service downtime happening here&#8230; and the problem persist for months here, and not being fixed. Disappointed.!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Imhosted uptime" href="http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Imhosted Uptime" src="http://www.imhostedreview.org/images/imhosted-uptime-september-2008.gif" alt="" width="585" height="692" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-for-september-2008/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imhosted uptime for july 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-for-july-2008</link>
		<comments>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-for-july-2008#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Imhosted Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imhosted Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imhosted Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imhostedreview.org/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imhosted uptime for july 2008: 94.2% over the Internet Yes, this is another month of worst service uptime from imhosted hosting. Previous month we see a 77% service uptime. And this month its 94%, will imhosted hosting delivering some serious web hosting service ?? The statistic we have here, shows that imhosted server downtime is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Imhosted uptime for july 2008:</strong> 94.2% over the Internet</p>
<p>Yes, this is another month of worst service uptime from imhosted hosting. Previous month we see a 77% service uptime. And this month its 94%, will imhosted hosting delivering some serious web hosting service ??</p>
<p>The statistic we have here, shows that imhosted server downtime is a lot, and their server is slow too, at 0.38 sec response time in average.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Imhosted uptime" href="http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Imhosted uptime" src="http://www.imhostedreview.org/images/imhosted-uptime-july-2008.gif" alt="" width="585" height="691" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-for-july-2008/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imhosted uptime for june 2008 suck</title>
		<link>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-for-june-2008-suck</link>
		<comments>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-for-june-2008-suck#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Imhosted Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imhosted Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imhosted Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imhostedreview.org/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imhosted uptime for june 2008: 77.5% over the Internet No explaination require, imhosted uptime really suck a big time. I hate to see hosting service that delivering suck a low grad hosting uptime. Definately there is problem with their hosting services, and it just happen. This explain alot of the imhosted support and technical quality [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Imhosted uptime for june 2008:</strong> 77.5% over the Internet</p>
<p>No explaination require, imhosted uptime really suck a big time. I hate to see hosting service that delivering suck a low grad hosting uptime. Definately there is problem with their hosting services, and it just happen. This explain alot of the imhosted support and technical quality a lot.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Imhosted Uptime" src="http://www.imhostedreview.org/images/imhosted-uptime-june-2008.gif" alt="" width="587" height="685" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imhostedreview.org/imhosted-uptime-for-june-2008-suck/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

